Side-by-side
Neon MCP Server vs Supabase MCP
Neon MCP Server (9.0/10) is the rounded choice; Supabase MCP (9.1/10) leads on adoption.
Both are scored on the same rubric (safety 35%, maintenance 25%, documentation 20%, adoption 20%) so every comparison below is apples-to-apples. How we score.
Verdict
Either works — they're effectively tied
Neon MCP Server and Supabase MCP score within noise of each other on safety, maintenance, documentation. Pick whichever fits your existing stack — install, ergonomics, or vendor preference will matter more than the score gap.
| Dimension | Neon MCP Serverneondatabase-labs | Supabase MCPsupabase-community |
|---|---|---|
| Skill score (overall) | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Safety sub-score | 95/100 | 95/100 |
| Maintenance sub-score | 94/100 | 90/100 |
| Documentation sub-score | 85/100 | 85/100 |
| Adoption sub-score | 79/100 | 91/100 |
| Community rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Platforms | MCP | MCP |
| Primary platform | MCP Servers | MCP Servers |
| Vendor | neondatabase-labs | supabase-community |
| Primary category | Data and Analysis | Data and Analysis |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| GitHub stars | 601 | 2.7K |
| Last commit | 2 days ago | 9 days ago |
| Last verified | May 24, 2026 | May 24, 2026 |
| Open flags | None | None |